SOC Incident Response Support Services
WN Mackenjas LLC mark
Incident Response
Fast Reporting. Controlled Response. Verified Recovery.
The Stakes

Adversaries Move in Minutes. Our CISA Clock Is One Hour.

Threat actors establish persistence and expand access before most organizations finish understanding the initial alert. Our standard: report to CISA within one hour of identification by the top-level SOC — then keep leadership answered on three questions as the picture develops: What happened. How bad is it. Is it over.

1 HR
CISA Reporting Window
From identification by the top-level SOC to a report in CISA's hands.
7
Required Data Fields
Addressed in every report, then updated as analysis progresses.
3
Questions Leadership Gets Answered
What happened. How bad is it. Is it over — backed by evidence, not guesswork.
Every phase produces documented evidence, defined decisions, and an accountable outcome.
Why This Delivery Wins

Six Commitments You Can Hold Us To

In plain terms: faster response, fewer surprises, and proof at every step.

⏱

Fast by Design

One-hour CISA reporting, pre-approved templates, named alternates.

⛨

Controlled

No detection change without approval. Every action is audited.

↻

Adaptive

New adversary techniques become detections, proven by purple teaming.

◎

No Blind Spots

Monitoring gaps and tool health tracked until every gap is closed.

◈

Measured

Time to detect, contain, eradicate, and recover, reported against targets.

⇄

One Team

SOC, IT, architecture, and leadership share one case record and one Gap Register.

If a control fails, a sensor goes dark, or a target is missed, we make it visible, assign ownership, and track corrective action.
Our Process

The Incident Response Lifecycle

Five phases take an incident from first alert to lasting improvement, with no gaps between them — wrapped end to end by program management, performance metrics, transition planning, and CISA coordination.

01

Preparation

Categorize, prioritize, and deconflict every event against authorized activity. Leadership receives an Initial Impact Assessment covering scope, severity, and workaround timelines.

02

Containment

Preserve volatile evidence, isolate the threat through coordinated action, and verify no new compromise before declaring containment — without destroying the evidence the investigation needs.

03

Analysis

Establish scope, cause, and impact from evidence — assets affected, privilege attained, attack path, and indicators and techniques mapped to MITRE ATT&CK.

04

Eradication and Recovery

Remove all malicious activity, rebuild or clean to a verified known-good state, and fix the exploited vulnerability — with proof at every step.

05

Post-Incident

After-action reports, lessons learned, and a metrics report. Every recommendation gets an owner and a due date, and new adversary techniques become new detections.

Incident response and detection engineering are two different disciplines under recognized cybersecurity standards — this five-phase lifecycle reflects NIST SP 800-61 Rev. 2's incident-handling model, our own six-stage Detection Engineering Lifecycle governs the next one. We deliver both, to their own standards, so an incident doesn't just get resolved — it gets harder to repeat.
Regulatory Reporting

Report to CISA Without Delay

We submit what we know within the one-hour deadline, then update the report as analysis progresses — under a documented approval path with a named alternate, so approval never stalls the clock.

Functional Impact
Effect on your organization's ability to deliver its mission or services.
Informational Impact
Loss, compromise, or exposure of sensitive data.
Recoverability
Our assessment of the time and resources required to restore operations.
Time of First Detection
When the activity was first identified by the top-level SOC.
Systems & Users Impacted
Scope of affected assets, accounts, and personnel.
Location of Observed Activity
Where in the environment the activity was observed.
Point of Contact for Follow-Up
A named individual CISA can reach for additional detail.
Formats and timelines follow CISA guidance. We prepare the report; release requires your organization's named approver, with an alternate on file.
Adaptive Defense

Stay Ahead of the Adversary

Attackers change tactics constantly, so our detections are built to change faster.

01

Learn

Threat intelligence, advisories, and findings from our own incidents.

02

Hunt

Search for the techniques before an alert fires.

03

Detect

Build detections and map each one to MITRE ATT&CK.

04

Validate

Purple team each detection against real attacker behavior.

05

Tune

Cut noise and keep true positives, under approval gates.

Behavior over signatures: attackers rename tools, not habits. Every detection is mapped to an ATT&CK technique. Every change is tested before it ships.
Threat Landscape

Attackers Change. So Do We.

The methods used against agencies and enterprises keep shifting — our detections and playbooks shift with them.

What Attackers Are Doing

✕Living off the land and legitimate tools
✕Stolen credentials and valid accounts
✕Cloud and SaaS abuse
✕Ransomware and extortion
✕Supply chain and third-party compromise

How We Adapt

✓Behavioral detections and baselines, not signatures alone
✓Identity analytics, credential reset, token revocation
✓Cloud and identity log coverage with matching playbooks
✓Tested playbook: legal, executive, and recovery steps
✓Vendor compromise procedure and scoped hunts
Every shift triggers the same loop: learn, hunt, detect, validate, tune.
Tuning Governance

Tuning With Control

Every change to our alerting needs approval, is tested, and is recorded. Nothing changes without approval. Nothing goes unrecorded.

AU-1

1. Request

Ticket logged.

AP-1

2. Analyze

Change approval.

AU-2

3. Build & Test

Test results.

AU-3

4. Peer Review

Reviewer logged.

AP-2

5. Change Control

Deploy approval.

AU-4

6. Deploy

Matches approval.

AU-5

7. Monitor

Results logged.

AP-3

8. Close

Closure approval.

Emergency path: verbal approval during an active incident, documented afterward. AU-6: quarterly review of every tuning change.
Visibility

You Cannot Defend What You Cannot See

Dashboards turn operational data into faster decisions, early warning, and accountability — every number traceable to its source and definition.

Management — response times, the CISA clock, open gaps, pending approvals.

Awareness — affected hosts, top talkers, top threats.

Tool Health — sensors, log sources, rules, capacity.

SOC Analysts — alert queue, noisy rules, cases, tuning.

Faster decisions. Early warning. Accountability — every number names its source and definition.
Management View Illustrative Sample
Avg. Time to Contain
38 min
CISA Reporting Compliance
100%
Open Gap Register Items
6
Pending Tuning Approvals
2
Figures shown are illustrative samples, not actual customer data.
Cross-Team Collaboration

One Team, One Picture of Risk

Security improves fastest when every team sees the same gaps and acts on them.

◉

SOC Analysts

Shared triage criteria and one case record, from alert to incident.

⚙

IT & System Owners

Containment and recovery coordinated before any action touches mission systems.

◫

Security Architect

Gap findings become design changes, not just new detections.

◈

OCIO / CISO

Metrics and the Gap Register drive investment and risk decisions.

⚖

CISA & Law Enforcement

One-hour reports and evidence handed over with chain of custody.

◎

Threat Intelligence

New adversary techniques drive hunts, purple team tests, and detections.

One case record. One Gap Register. One picture of risk.
Proof and Close

What You Can Hold Us To

Four decisions put this operating model into action on day one.

01

Authority

Name the approvers and alternates for AP-1, AP-2, AP-3, and CISA report release.

02

Operating Rhythm

Confirm the reporting cadence, biweekly briefing, and incident stand-up frequency.

03

Performance

Approve severity-based response targets and the metrics used to measure success.

04

Validation

Approve the purple team cadence and rules of engagement.

Fast reporting. Controlled response. Verified recovery. Continuous improvement.
Why WN Mackenjas

Built for Organizations That Can't Afford a Slow Answer

WN Mackenjas has delivered detection engineering and incident response support as a subcontractor on an active government security program since 2022 — tuning detection technologies, closing telemetry gaps, and strengthening threat visibility, continuing today through our partner's 2025 merger. Our methodology is structured around NIST SP 800-53 and the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0.

CompTIA SecurityX CompTIA Security+ Self-Certified Small Business Minority & Black American-Owned Active SAM.gov Registration DC CBE Certification — In Progress

See our full registration details and past performance on the Government & Public Sector page, or the process behind this work on Methodology.